Criticism of The Theory of The Sacred Community and Profane Society: Relevance of Durkheim’s Sociological Thinking in Discourse Enforcement of Sharia in Indonesia

Mibtadin Mibtadin

Abstract


Durkheim’s Social Theory undertakes a careful analysis of sacred societies. He argues that in each society, there is a general system of belief which legitimatizes the social order and raises the collective, networked, and symbol bounded awareness and therefore keeps the social system run. Religions bring meanings to individual and societal lives, hopes for a more external life in the hereafter. They become values which strengthen the social group’s norms, moral sanctions to individuals, and shared objective foundations of values for the society. However, the recent development of social lives has challenged such view. In the case of Indonesia, the modern, opened, fast changing, group segmented, and religiously pluralized societies illustrate a shifting paradigm from sacred to profane societies. Durkheim’s sociological theory is considered less able to explain the phenomena of suicide bombing and the establishment of Islamic Sharia idea in Indonesia. The researcher’s findings reveal that it is not only the religious factor which drives such phenomena but also the interrelated factors of politics, education, mentality, modernization, and culture.


Keywords


Durkheim, Sacred Societies, Profane Societies, Religious pluralism.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Taufik dan A.C Van der Leeden (Ed). 1996. Durkheim dan Pengantar Sosiologi Moralitas, cet. I. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Ahmed, Akbar S. 2003. Living Islam,terj, Rahmani Astuti, Bandung: Mizan.

Durkheim, Emile. 1950. The Elementary of the Religious Life, tr. Joseph Ward Swain, New York: Macmillan Company.

Gellner, David N. 2002. “Pendekatan Antropologis”, dalam Peter Connolly (ed.) terj. Imam Khoiri, Aneka Pendekatan Studi

Agama.Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Giddens, Anthony. 1986. Kapitalisme dan Teori Sosial Modern: Suatu Analisis Karya Tulis Marx, Durkheim dan Weber, terj. Soehaba Kramadibrata. Jakarta: UI–Press.

Hasan, Noorhaidi dan Abubakar, Irfan (ed.). 2011. Islam di Ruang Publik. Politik Identititas dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia.

Jakarta: CSRC, UIN Jakarta.

Hendropuspito. 1988. Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Johnsin, Doyle P. 1994. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Jones, Pip. 1985. Pengantar Teori-teori Sosial. Dari Fungsionalisme hingga Post–Modernisme, terj. Achmad Fedyani Saifuddin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Kahmad, Dadang. 2002. Sosiologi Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maliki, Zainuddin. 2003. Narasi Agung. Tiga Teori Sosial Hegemonik. Surabaya: LPAM

Muhni, Djuretna A. Imam. 1994. Moral dan Religi, Menurut Emile Durkheim dan Henri Bergson. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Nottingham, Elizabet K.1996. Agama dan Masyarakat: Suatu Pengantar Sosiologi Agama. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali Press.

O’dea, Thomas F. 1985. Sosiologi Agama. Suatu Pengantar Awal, terjemahan oleh Tim Penerjemah Yasogama. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali Press.

Pals, Daniel L. 2003. Dekonstruksi Kebenaran. Kritik Tujuh Teori Agama, terjemahan oleh Inyiak Ridwan Muzir, M. Syukri. Yogyakarta: IRCISoD.

Sakuntala, I.B. 2003. Pariwisata Terorisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Marwa.

Sanusi, Dzulqarnain M. 2010. Antara Jihad dan Terorisme. Makassar: Pustaka As-Sunnah.

Scharf, Betty R. 1995. Kajian Sosiologi Agama. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Tischler, Henri L. 1995. Introduction to Sociology. Chicago: Holt, Rineheart and Winston.

Turner, Bryan S. 2006. Agama dan Teori Sosial, terjemahan oleh Inyiak Ridwan Munir. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.

Yaqin, M Ainul. 2005.Pendidikan Multikultural: Cross Cultural Understanding Untuk Demokrasi dan Keadilan.Yogyakarta: Pilar Media.

Yusuf, Mohammad Asror (ed.). 2006. Agama Sebagai Kritik Sosial di Tengah Arus Kapitalisme Global. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v2i01.301

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Mibtadin Mibtadin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.